Board of Trustees Rejects Nixon World Institute

Tom Zasadzinski
Editor In Chief

The proposed Richard M. Nixon Institute of World Affairs will not be com­ing to the University of La Verne, following its rejection by the University’s Board of Trustees.

“I think in this form the issue is dead,” said Richard Landis, second vice president of the Board of Trustees.

The Board voted 21 to 16 against the institute Saturday, ending more than two months of student, faculty and alumni debate.

The decision followed two hours of debate and votes on three amend­ments to the proposal brought up by trustee representatives of the Church of the Brethren.

Votes on two of the amendments were positive, but the third, which would have changed the name of the institute to the United States Presidents’ In­stitute of World Affairs, was defeated 20 to 16 with one abstention.

Discussion on the proposal centered on the divisiveness of the issue and the name, Richard Nixon.

“There is serious polarization in the faculty,” said Dr. Robert Neher, facul­ty representative to the Board of Trustees. “These rifts would be difficult to bridge.”

Regarding the name, Richard Nixon, Trustee H. Lynn Sheller said, “Unscrupulous men count on people having short memories. As for the in­stitute, it is the association with the name Richard Nixon that is highly divisive.”

The institute would have brought together “scholars from various academic disciplines and would have blended internationally recognized per­sonalities, who would develop responsible, realistic solutions to world pro­blems,” according to the written proposal developed by the Office of Institu­tional Advancement.

Dr. Richard Green, vice president of Institutional Advancement, said at a press conference held immediately after the board meeting, “I now hope we can avoid any embarrassment to Nixon. We approached them on the subject, and we were very well received. I hope we can handle this with class.”

Landis and Dr. Donald Clague, vice president of Graduate Studies, were disappointed that the institute vote failed.

“The majority decision will prevail with the full concurrence of the rest of the Board. I will support the decision, but that doesn’t mean I agree with it,” said Landis.

Landis felt that the institute would have provided a much needed extension of the University’s field of study.

“The decision doesn’t negate the need for a world affairs institute,” he said. “This college needs that as part of its curriculum.”

The proposal, which has been in the works for over a year, had won narrow approval from the faculty and alumni in votes held in the past months. A Campus Times poll found that more than 64 percent of the student body approved of the institute. The Associated Students Federation voted against the proposal by a six to five margin.

The outside news media was banned from the Board meeting, as were tape recorders. This was done, according to Dr. Clague, to promote discussion at the meeting.

“We wanted to consider this and to make the decisions on our own without outside influences and pressures,” said Dr. Green.

The Board meeting was attended by 37 of the 45 trustee members. That number was significantly higher than the normal 30 or 31 members who at­tend most board meetings, said Dr. Clague. Most of those members absent were from out of state.

The Nixon Institute was not the only important issue on the Board’s agen­da.

The Board also voted to go ahead with a plan to sell Brandt and Studebaker-Hanawalt dormitories to a special group of investors for $600,000. The investors would be close friends of the University and would, hopefully, donate the buildings back to the college after a period of time, ac­cording to University officials.

“Twenty or 30 of us will be part of this partnership, so eventually the University will have a predominant number of shares. I don’t see any chance that we would lose the dormitories. We need this cash desperately,” said University President Dr. Armen Sarafian.

Management of the dorms would stay the same, and the student residents would not be affected by the change. Actually, the investors would only be purchasing the buildings themselves, not the land.

The Board also voted to take over general operation of the San Fernando School of Law. The new acquisition is valued at $2.7 million and will also ac­commodate students enrolled in the University’s School of Continuing Education.

The San Fernando school will still be run as an autonomous institution. There are currently 220 students enrolled there.

Tom Zasadzinski
Other Stories

Latest Stories

Related articles

Ableism at ULV displayed in photo array

Niki Elliott, clinical professor and co-director of the Center for Neurodiversity, Learning and Wellness, and Sylvia Mac, associate professor of education and director of the Center for Learning Innovation, presented “All are Welcome: A Window into the Experiences of Students with Disabilities at ULV” Tuesday at the Quay Davis Executive Board Room.

Alumnus shares Gladdys Muir’s accomplishments

During a recent seminar presented by writer, philosopher and La Verne alumnus Jon Hall, titled “Toward World Understanding: The Awakening of Gladdys Muir,” students were given a glimpse into the life of Gladdys Muir, a former La Verne professor who was a prominent figure in the Brethren movement and a peacemaker in society.

Archivist examines war and peace at La Verne

Benjamin Jenkins, archivist and assistant professor of history, presented “War and Peace At La Verne: Soldiers, Conscientious Objectors, Public Servants, and Brethren Values at the University” at the Quay Davis Executive Board Room on Tuesday.

Credit rating revised to match University’s budget outlook

Moody's Investors Services revised the University of La Verne's stable outlook to negative after affirming its “A3” issuer and revenue bond rating last month.