Prop. 66 offers better batting average

“Three strikes and you’re out” should not apply to every wrong move, especially when it comes to certain crimes. With the passing of the Three Strikes Law in 1994, repeat offenders were dealt longer prison sentences. Under this law “second strikers” were to serve twice as long prison sentences if convicted of a serious or violent felony, and “third-strikers” would in turn serve a lifetime sentence, or no less than a 25-year term when convicted of a third felony. Meant to punish sex offenders, the law’s scope has broadened to incorporate other felonies.

Proposition 66, a voter initiative on the Nov. 2 ballot, would soften the Three Strikes Law and lengthen the third-striker’s sentence only if the crime is serious or violent. Leaving a convict in the prison system longer leads us, the taxpayers, to pay these criminals’ expenses rather than our tax dollars that could go towards other areas, such as education. According to the Legislative Analyst’s office, as of April 2004 there were 163,000 inmates in California prisons leading to operational costs of approximately $5.7 billion for 2004-2005 year. So lets get this straight, we are paying more money to keep those convicted felons in jail even if the crimes they committed for the second or third time would have otherwise granted them a shorter prison term?

Many second and third strikers are serving longer sentences for crimes such as burglary, assault with intent to commit robbery or possession of a controlled substance. Many supporters of Proposition 66, such as Citizens Against Violent Crime, see the law as being interpreted in a way that takes advantage of the law’s power, causing it to border on the line of cruel and unusual punishment. Felons should not get away without punishment, but if they can serve a sentence determined by a judge and learn their lesson then why pay more money to keep them in prison longer than needed? We could use the money we save for education or even prison rehabilitation programs, which in recent years have been cut.

True, they may be more afraid to commit another felony if they know it could earn them a life sentence. But even knowing the consequences if they commit another crime doesn’t necessarily deter them and besides, the punishment should fit the crime. Under Proposition 66, many violent offenders would still be subject to Three Strikes. So why waste our money – and their lives – with prolonged sentences for less serious offenders.

Under Proposition 66, many nonviolent felonies would no longer be subject to Three Strikes, including: attempted burglary, burglary of an unoccupied residence, nonresidential arson resulting in no significant injuries, and unintentional infliction of significant personal injury while committing a felony offense, just to name a few.

The proposed law also calls for each crime to be tried separately. The passage of this law would not mean criminals would take over the streets committing crimes with no consequences. It also does not mean that those already in prison will not serve their time.

Prisoners will still be tried based on their felonies and get what they deserve in the end.

Less wasted money and appropriate, rather than over-zealous punishment – who wouldn’t like to see that?

Other Stories

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the Campus Times Editorial Board.

Latest Stories

Related articles

Research shows impact of juvenile court system

Sharon Davis, professor of sociology, talks about the issues surrounding the juvenile court system and low income families on Tuesday at the weekly faculty lecture series held in the Campus Center Ballroom.

Claudette Colvin is unsung hero for civil rights movement

Claudette Colvin, an activist and pioneer in the civil rights movement, refused to give up her seat months before Rosa Parks refused hers. She was 15 at the time.

L.A. marijuana cases set to be dismissed

According to Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón, Los Angeles County is set to dismiss about 60,000 marijuana convictions in the upcoming months. The final step is to consider damages caused by narcotics enforcements before California voted to decriminalize marijuana.

Commentary: Chauvin trial is a sigh of relief but there is more work to be done

George Floyd died May 25, 2020, at the hands of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who kneeled on his neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds. Just one month short of the one-year anniversary of the tragic day, justice was served and Chauvin was convicted of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.