Ferguson panel discusses racism

Isaac Carter, panelist and director of student affairs at the University of La Verne College of Law speaks with senior social science major Gage Henderson before Tuesday’s panel discussion “Ferguson: Protector or criminal? Advocate or thug? Or neither? Examine your perceptions.” The panel discussion was the second of a five-part series called “Ferguson: A Call For Action and Understanding,” designed to promote discussion about many of the topics surrounding the events in Ferguson last month. / photo by Emily Bieker
Isaac Carter, panelist and director of student affairs at the University of La Verne College of Law speaks with senior social science major Gage Henderson before Tuesday’s panel discussion “Ferguson: Protector or criminal? Advocate or thug? Or neither? Examine your perceptions.” The panel discussion was the second of a five-part series called “Ferguson: A Call For Action and Understanding,” designed to promote discussion about many of the topics surrounding the events in Ferguson last month. / photo by Emily Bieker

Hal Hargrave
Staff Writer

Law professors and practicing attorneys continued the second panel of a five-part series “Ferguson: Protector or criminal? Advocate or thug? Or neither? Examine your perceptions” Tuesday in the Campus Center ballroom.

The panel of three focused on the perception among society and how individuals view African-American males.

Krystal Lyons, director of external relations for La Verne’s College of Law, organized and moderated a discussion which was intended to get people to stop and evaluate their biases.

“Initially we were going to use (this as) something to teach on and for students to evaluate it from a legal perspective,” Lyons said. “But when more sub-topics started to arise, we decided to break it up into five different sections, so more people would be able to come out and show an interest in the topics they were passionate about.”

The panelists were Isaac Carter, adjunct professor of sociology and anthropology; Leeshawn Moore, director of Institutional Research for the College of Law; and Kevin Rogan, assistant inspector general of Los Angeles police commission. They debated various ongoing societal issues and perceptions relating to Ferguson.

Lyons showed a slide show with various images of armed cops and unarmed but looting African-American males. She asked the panel their thoughts about these images, in which several of the cops had assault rifles.

Rogan said assault rifles have no place in crowd control and asked the crowd if the military should be giving their devices to law enforcement.

He said there are roughly 80 uses of force annually by police officers in the Los Angeles area, and a majority of those are against African-Americans.

“California cops like to think that they are better trained, and that was indicated during the Occupy L.A. issue,” Rogan said.

“This was handled with relatively no violence, so I believe the Ferguson case was a reflection of the notion that the Ferguson officers felt they were entitled to bring assault rifles out to a scene.”

Rogan pointed out that as people we have a fear of the unknown and going into unfamiliar territories. Officers have to evaluate situations and people quickly, make judgments based upon their evaluations and then immediately act upon the situation.

The media has played a vital role in magnifying the Ferguson case.

“What if these photos were racially reversed?” junior criminology major Natalin Daldalian said. “What if the African-American cop killed a white person? Which happened in Utah last month, which I’m sure nobody heard about. I think the media puts the spin on it and to put things into people’s heads.”

Moore said if these black men were in a suit and tie they would be looked at with no prejudice. She said society does not see humanity in African-American males and we do a character assassination of them. She said we continue to see people as criminals and this is an issue of humanity for all ethnicities.

“It has started long before police officers became police officers,” Moore said. “We are taught in society that everybody is different from the next person and we can’t come together because we are different.”

Lyons said our minds automatically categorize information and people, which leads to stereotyping, judging and prejudice within society. She said we have an unconscious bias when we look at people, namely African American males.

Carter said that we have to address these issues in life systematically and not from a criminal perspective to see how we can better things in La Verne first.

“I was pleased by tonight’s involvement of the people because this type of conversation needs to happen,” Carter said.

“I was displeased with the amount of people showed up because if we are able to look at this in a complex cultural and social perspective, we can all work together to try and understand these from all perspectives by talking about it together.”

Hal Hargrave can be reached at hallett.hargrave@laverne.edu.

Other Stories

Latest Stories

Related articles

Leopards discover new adventure at Grad Fair

The community event took place on Wednesday at Citrus Lawn.

Lecture discusses living in the present

Michele Assael-Shafia, assistant professor of law at the University of La Verne, spoke April 17 in the Ludwick Center Sacred Space, closing out the University’s “What Matters to Me and Why” speaker series for semester with a powerful message.

Symposium challenges understanding of AI use

Three panelists joined the University of La Verne College of Law and Public Service to give their 11th Annual Symposium, titled “Artificial Intelligence (AI)”. Which focused on the impacts of AI and how it can be implemented into everyday life of schools and law firms. 

Lawyers weigh in on encountering ICE

President Donald Trump’s message to all undocumented immigrants in the nation is clear. He wants them all to go back to where they came from.