Bylaw changes undermine faculty

“Secrecy breeds suspicion,” a phrase used while discussing the release of the Board of Trustee’s bylaws this fall. The bylaws allow the University’s president to veto faculty decisions with minimal time for them to gather and vote to overturn his or her decision.

While faculty are working with the Board to revise this component of the Bylaws, the lack of transparency about the bylaws and the backlash from more than a few faculty members has called into question the soundness of the University’s tradition of faculty governance here at La Verne.

Today’s students feel as though college is more of a business than a bastion of higher learning. Students enter college after paying hundreds to apply, only to be hit hard with student loans and fees for their education that are sometimes not anticipated.

The University of La Verne, with the billboards along the freeway and the radio advertisements, feels like a business trying to advertise its way to the top, despite its nonprofit university tradition.

While all executive decisions for the University are in the hands of the administration, including the president and the board of trustees, it is disheartening to learn that the lack of communication within the University seems to be causing a rift between faculty and administration in the development of academic programs.

Recently, as part of the 2020 vision for the University, a physician’s assistant program was handed down into the laps of faculty members without any prior knowledge. The lack of shared governance in this decision is just one example why a power like a veto is dangerous.

Another example of this power is the proposed parking structure that will take the place of Lot D and will bump the construction of a new-and-needed science building back by seven years.

Without the faculty, there would be no University. Out of respect for the tradition of universities as a whole, administration needs to take a step back from the branding, marketing and expansion of the institution and remember that at the heart of the colleges are students who want to learn from faculty that are respected by the administrators on campus.

After a while, it seems as though the only reason why academic decisions are being made would be to target a new audience in the market for swiping up doe-eyed incoming students with pockets full of tuition ready to feed into the university.

In order for a university to benefit students and uphold it’s academic prestige, faculty governance needs to be respected. After all, without it, we will become an institution completely entrenched in billboards and marketing schemes rather than academia.

Other Stories

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the Campus Times Editorial Board.

Latest Stories

Related articles

Administrators reverse January interterm move to May

University of La Verne administrators have reevaluated their plan to move January interterm to May, and will no longer be moving forward with the change that had been set for the 2025-26 academic year.

Provost, president cancel three-day mandate

As part of their effort to show support for faculty governance, the president and the provost rescinded the controversial mandate – which had been written into 2023-2024 faculty contracts – requiring that full time faculty be on campus at least three days a week.

University expects 2.9% tuition increase for ’24-’25

The University of La Verne’s Board of Trustees is scheduled to meet today to make a decision today on a 2.9% tuition increase for the 2024-2025 academic year.

Students don’t want January Interterm moved to May

News of the University administration’s intention to eliminate January term and replace it with a similar May term starting in the 2025-26 academic year was an unpleasant surprise to  23 of 25 La Verne students who responded to an informal survey last week on campus.