Cultures are not mascots

The California state assembly’s education committee unanimously approved legislation that would finally ban schools from using or continuing to use the offensive term Redskins as their mascot last week.

Assemblyman Luis Alejo, D-Salinas, initiated the legislation in December 2014 after the legislature criticized Washington for continuing to use the term as a name for its NFL team and four of its high schools’ mascots.

Similar legislation was passed in 2004 by the California legislature, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it, and schools have continued to use the term.

Redskins, in American culture, incorrectly refers to the people of Native American ancestry. It has two possible English origins; one stating it refers to the red paint they wore on their faces, and the other stating it refers to Native Americans being scalped. Regardless of its origin, the term is offensive in today’s culture.

Those who oppose the California legislation say the term in not offensive and refers to language scholar Ives Goddard’s meaning of the term. In his studies Goddard found that the term is derived from Native American phrases combining the color red with terms for flesh, skin and man, according to’s article “The Real History of the Word Redskin.”

Although there is much debate about the origin of the term and whether or not it is actually offensive, given the United State’s has had a historically unstable relationship with Native American tribes, it is best to show respect and stop acknowledging the word in American culture, especially in our educational institutions.

Several protests have been held since the name became the center of controversy in the NFL and now protestors are pushing for the term to be banned altogether. The United States prides itself on being a progressive country, but the fact that legislation regarding the use of this term has previously been vetoed makes the country’s progression questionable.

New York, Colorado, Oregon and Oklahoma have already passed similar legislation and changed schools’ names and mascots.

Now it is time for California to follow in their path. The current legislation still needs to be approved by the Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism and Internet Media Committee, the entire legislature and ultimately Gov. Jerry Brown.

Other Stories

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the Campus Times Editorial Board.

Latest Stories

Related articles

Bill aims to increase teacher wages

On April 26, Assembly Bill 938 was introduced by California Assemblymember, Al Muratsuchi (D – Torrance) and if passed, the bill will raise teacher and school staff pay by 50% by 2030.

Los Angeles’ poor air quality reflected in report

Los Angeles received an F grade in the 2023 “State of the Air” annual report. The failing grade is due to the bad air quality in the region. 

Bill omits toxic chemicals in foods linked to health issues

California assembly members, Jesse Gabriel (D – Woodland Hills) and Buffy Wicks (D – Oakland) introduced Assembly Bill 418 at the beginning of February. If passed, this bill will ban five toxic chemicals used in certain foods that are linked to health problems.

Bill would benefit journalism industry

The California Journalism Preservation Act, Assembly Bill 886, introduced Feb. 14 by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, would require digital advertising companies like Facebook and Google to pay publishers a “journalism usage fee” each time they use local news content alongside advertising.