Citizenship question would mislead

editorial cartoon by Danielle De Luna
editorial cartoon by Danielle De Luna

The U.S. Department of Justice is planning to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 Census American Community Survey, a change which, under the Donald Trump administration, may result in an inaccurate count of the country’s population.

The question, which has not been asked on the Census Bureau survey since 1950, is phrased as follows: “Is this person a citizen of the United States?”

There are five options in response to the inquiry, including four that indicate the person is of United States origin, and one that indicates the person is not a citizen.

The question does not initially appear to be a hindrance to the democratic process. However, coupled with the contentious political and social climate fostered by the Trump administration, many non-citizens may choose not to answer the question out of fear of deportation.

The Justice Department added the question to gain an understanding of the voting population that can only be calculated through the Census Bureau survey.

The survey samples only 2.6% of the population, and the Justice Department has proposed that adding the question to the mandatory Census will help ensure protections for minority voters enforced under the federal Voting Rights Act, according to the Pew Research Center.

Although Census responses are supposed to be kept confidential, privacy protections have been violated by the U.S. government before.

The Japanese American Citizens League issued a statement in opposition to the proposed citizenship question, referencing the Census Bureau’s release of Japanese Americans’ names and addresses to the U.S. Secret Service during the 1940s.

An inaccurate count will be a detriment to the democratic system in the United States. If immigrants shun the census, it could reduce the number of congressional seats and the amount of federal funding in states with large numbers of foreign-born residents, such as California, which has more than any other state, according to the Pew Research Center.

As the Supreme Court considers the citizenship question on the 2020 Census, it is imperative that they analyze its effect in relationship to the political climate the Trump administration has fostered concerning immigration and the safety of immigrants. The humane and democratic decision requires that the question be considered outside of a vacuum of perfect ethics.

Other Stories

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the Campus Times Editorial Board.

Other Stories

Latest Stories

Related articles

False election claims threaten democracy

Democracy is at stake as the current Republican Party, or the new Trump Party as they should be called, continues the false narratives of Democrats stealing the presidential election from Donald Trump.

Worldwide forest growth highlights need for conservation

A recent study has found that an area of forest the size of France has regrown around the world over the past 20 years, according to The Guardian, showing concrete proof that regeneration of our forests is possible.

Election brought unexpected political change

Marcia Godwin, professor of public administration, discussed Congressional districts that flipped in 2020, shifts in voting trends, and the media's role in the outcomes, with 31 Zoom participants on Tuesday.

Community members stand against anti-Asian hate

More than 100 people attended a vigil Sunday outside the United Church of Christ in Claremont – to stand in solidarity with the Asain American Pacific Islander community and against hate – as hate crimes against the community have increased dramatically since the start of the pandemic.