Money spent on recall could have been better used

Now that Gavin Newsom has taken back the reins from what could have been the end of his career as governor of California, residuals from the process have become more apparent as the expenditures of the recall election become more clear.

While the recall, which was rejected by 63% of voters, was unnecessary and a way for Republicans to try and take control of California, the process might have hurt Californians more than it benefited them.

According to the California Department of Finance, staging the recall election cost the state $276 million. This money could have been used efficiently elsewhere to fund schools, create recreational centers, help in-need communities, help the housing crisis victims, or create a difference that would have at least been noticeable by Californians.

There are a million different things that could have been done instead. For instance, it costs about $23,244 to put a student through a year of college in California nowadays according to Education Data, a nonprofit organization promoting transparent education statistics. The money spent on the recall could have put 12,000 students through college. This would have inevitably helped the economy a few years down the line with the value these graduates would have brought to the community. It is a far cry from where we stand now.

Though $276 million might seem like a lot as it is, that was not the only amount that was spent surrounding the recall.

Advocacy against the recall far outweighed the supporters, the supporters for the recall only raised $16.5 million according to the secretary of state’s website, while a large sum, quite a stark contrast to the $80 million raised by the opposition for the recall. And that does not even get into the money individual candidates spent on their ill-fated campaigns.

These donations could have been in better hands as tangible forms of help, like food to people suffering from hunger or books for children. Instead this money was spent on ideas that were already set in tone to be agreed upon by the majority of people.

This was basically a useless process we all knew the outcome to. Newsom was obviously going to win because of his success at maintaining the coronavirus death and infectious rates low through legal mandates all across California. Smaller states could barely keep their head above water while Newsom had created mandates that made it possible for those numbers to decrease.

All told, the state spent nearly $400 million to entertain a political tantrum thrown by a vast minority of Californians. It was certainly disheartening having to witness those valuable funds reduced to a piece of paper with two questions.

Other Stories

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the Campus Times Editorial Board.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Stories

Related articles

RESTRICT Act would result in the ban of TikTok, other apps

U.S. senators Mark R. Warner and John Thune proposed the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act on March 7. If the bill were to pass, it would give the government the power to act against technological companies if they pose a national security threat to Americans.

ASULV urges students to vote

The Associated Students of University of La Verne, the student government at the University, is holding elections for the various positions in the organization next week.

LVPD concealed carry weapon applications cause a divide

The city of La Verne's recently announced concealed weapons permit policy has drawn a threat of legal action over the cost of the permits.

Legislation would teach high school students financial literacy

An Assembly Bill, that would require all California high school students to take a full-year course in personal finance before graduating, was introduced Feb. 15, by California State Assemblymember Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento.