Climate change is real

Our president regularly denies scientific evidence, which shows not only that climate change is happening but also that human beings are the cause, saying that people with high intelligences like himself do not see the evidence.

Trump is not alone, as of 2015, 56 percent of Republicans in Congress have denied human responsibility for climate change, according to There is a public controversy over whether climate change is real, turning factual, scientific research into nothing more than politics, because, quite frankly, there is no denying that climate change is real.

A large portion of the debate has to do with whether human actions contribute to climate change. Many argue that the melting ice caps and increase in temperatures are nothing more than natural or cyclical changes in weather. Others argue that the science behind it is far too uncertain.

However, the scientific consensus on climate change states that the climate on Earth is affected by greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans, according to scientific research conducted by Several scientific outlets have all come to similar conclusions regarding greenhouse gas emissions and human’s role.

Their conclusion states that humans are causing the rise in temperature all over the globe, and that the problem remains not only serious, but in dire need of major reform. With no reform, we are looking at an expected increase in temperature degree that could lead to droughts, extreme heat waves and a massive increase in poverty.

Our president not only denied the existence of climate change as a whole, but he even denied a warning from his own administration’s caution of a horrible further impact in response. Many politicians refuse to acknowledge the critical need for regulation in the area of climate change, due to their siding with massive corporations, such as that of the oil and energy companies.

Climate change reform would mean corporations would have to shell out more money to not only change standards, but possibly risk losing business entirely should we ever move into only clean, renewable energy.

The scientific consensus on climate change has been determined through the research of 18 different scientific associations consisting of groups like the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union and the American Meteorological Society, among several others.

With that being said, the consensus was agreed upon not by politicians, or random everyday people. The consensus was agreed upon by legitimate scientific research, factual evidence and based upon scientific claims. There is no room for denial when it comes to scientific facts.

Climate change should have never been considered a political stance. Climate change is scientific research, and it always has been. We need to stop allowing political motives to rule over whether or not we save the planet, our only home available.

Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the Campus Times Editorial Board.

Latest Stories

Related articles

Club spreads environment awareness

The La Verne Ocean Movement Club is a student led organization on campus that is devoted to cleaning up the local community. The club’s purpose is to emphasize the effects that individual activities have on our environment.

Theologian tackles spiritual side of climate change at Fasnacht Lecture

Theologian Catherine Keller speaks about ecological issues Oct. 5 in Morgan Auditorium for the annual Fasnacht Lecture.

Lecture puts climate change in context

Former Minister of Environment of Morocco and climate change activist Hakima El Haité presented “Climate Change and International relations” for the 2023 Benzair Bhutto and Ahmed Ispahani International Lecture Wednesday in Morgan Auditorium. 

Los Angeles’ poor air quality reflected in report

Los Angeles received an F grade in the 2023 “State of the Air” annual report. The failing grade is due to the bad air quality in the region.